Life by the Imperial Roads:

Roman Provincial Settlement Excavation and Survey

2014 Evaluation

Pre-Arrival:

 

Did the project staff provide you with enough information beforehand to organize your packing for and travel to the project?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          1          2          6          Average: 91%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Was the pickup arrangement made prior to the project adequately seen to by project staff?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          0          0          9          Average: 100%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Comments:

 

  • I just looked for the beard

  • Tell people to bring towels

  • Towels…

  • I always bring a towel

 

Housing:

 

Were the living accommodations provided by the project adequate for your needs?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          0          1          8          Average: 98%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants) 

 

Comments:

 

  • I <3 Tante Leana 

  • Milika is a sweetheart!

  • Wish I had a mirror above the bathroom sink.

 

Food:

 

Were the meals provided by the project adequate for your needs?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          0          0          9          Average: 100%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Comments:

 

  • Perhaps too tasty. I may have gained weight.

  • Can I get a recipe book?

  • I also <3 sarmale.

  • Freaking love mici

 

General Logistics:

 

Did you encounter any problems with the accommodations, food or travel?

 

  • No 

  • NO

  • Not with Archaeotek

  • Yes

  • NO

  • No, except the well water…

  • No

  • No

 

If so, did you ask the project staff for assistance?

 

  • Yes

 

Was the project staff able to address your concerns to your satisfaction?

 

  • Yes

  • Yes!

  • Every time!!

 

Lectures:

 

Were the formal lectures presented informative and useful?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          0          2          7          Average: 96%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Were the formal lectures presented interesting and engaging?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          1          1          7          Average: 93%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Did you find the supplementary materials provided informative and useful?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          0          2          7          Average: 96%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants) 

 

Comments:

 

  • I didn’t do the readings, but plan to eventually.

  • Uhhhh……! [and a drawing of a cap with a feather in it]

  • My dad liked the articles too.

  • I wish there were even more lectures and materials

 

Excavation and Survey:

 

Were the instructions provided by project staff in the field clear and helpful?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          1          1          7          Average: 93%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants) 

 

Did the project staff offer you a thorough theoretical understanding of the methods being employed?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          1          0          2          6          Average: 89%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants) 

 

Did your participation in the project offer new understandings of archaeological field methods?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          0          1          8          Average: 98%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Did you feel actively engaged in all aspects of data collection in the field?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          1          0          8          Average: 96%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Comments:

 

  • You should mention up front what we’re looking for in trenches.  I think I easily destroyed 2 ft. of painted plaster before I knew it was a thing. 

  • I learned more here in the field than in three archaeology classes combined.

  • I’m a very hands-on person and I learned more about archaeology on this dig than I did in my theory classes.

 

Laboratory:

 

Were the instructions provided by project staff in the lab clear and helpful?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          1          2          6          Average: 91%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Do you feel you gained an understanding of the analytical methods employed (i.e. phosphate soil analysis, typological sorting of ceramics, etc.)?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          1          1          7          Average: 93%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Did you feel actively engaged in all aspects of analysis in the lab?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          0          1          8          Average: 98%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Comments:

 

  • Did we do [type sorting]?

  • It was quite cramped @ times.

 

General:

 

Did you feel overall intellectually engaged with your work?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          1          2          6         Average: 91%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Was the project staff able to adequately answer all of your questions?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          0          0          9          Average: 100%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Were your interactions with the Romanian staff informative and helpful?

 

                      Poor    1          2          3          4          5          Excellent

Evaluation:                0          0          0          0          9          Average: 100%

Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)

 

Comments:

 

  • I thought it was great to work w/ the Romanians and especially hear lectures by them in their areas of specialty- e.g. Alex and the prehistory lecture.

  • YAS

  • 10/10 I would follow Marius into battle.

  • Te ador Romanians!

  • Marius and Alex were freaking fantastic.

 

Overall Comments:

 

Please provide us with your thoughts on what you found most rewarding about your archaeological experience on the project:

 

  • We got a chance to do a little bit of everything - total station, lab work, even reenactment. Drew from a large scope of experiences in order to gain an understanding of culture.

  • Enjoyed working with students and staff. Digging!

  • Overall it was an incredible experience! We got along well which was awesome, and the staff were excellent.  I will return next year.

  • Bessie.

  • Interacting with locals and putting our finds in perspective by visiting local sites was highly rewarding.  Each experience drove home what we learned.

 

Other comments?

 

  • The weekend trips were great, thank you for those.  10/10 would recommend. POSEIDON BEARD

  • Several disagreements with data collection - surface collection in drastically varying vegetation level - wait, that’s it.

  • Thanks for a great dig!

WHAT'S UP?
LAST EVENT

NEW PROJECTS

 

  • The outstanding success of our 2018 and 2019 GPR projects, the Applied Field Geophysics Workshop - GPR Applications, prompted us to buy a second GPR unit with a different central frequency and a different configuration. As a result, our participants will have the unique opportunity to get fully proficient on a 250MHz GPR system, in a cart configuration, as well as 500MHz system, in a rough terrain configuration.

  • Furthermore, participants who are committed to expand their field skill set can register to our new Geophysics Exploration and Field Excavation program. It is a 4 week program, combining the GPR Applications Workshop (5 days) and  Roman Villa Excavation (3 weeks). Participants save $200 over the combined costs of the individual programs.

2020

New for our 2020 season: our Applied Field Geophysics Workshop-GPR Applications will allow the comparative professional training on the core GPR systems and configurations used in near surface investigations: 250MHz and 500MHz transducers, in respectively cart and rough terrain configurations. Our program is open to all disciplines, focusing on GPR theory, methods, techniques and applications.

 

As a result of overwhelming positive response and further request from our participants, we are offering the possibility to combine all sessions of our the GPR Applications Workshop with both field sessions of our Roman Villa Excavation as a stand alone program, allowing to save $200 on the combined fees. Our two research/training case study sites have been carefully chosen to combine increasing complexity of ancient, historical and modern features. These sites provide an unparalleled access to a diverse set of features and conditions.  We address urban and proto-urban settlement construction, complex anthropogenic stratigraphic relationships, variation in soil structure and conditions, wide range of materials and their use/reuse, unmapped ancient and modern utilities, potential graves, modern and ancient civil works projects (including the remains of roads, aqueducts, and wells), changes in hydrogeological environment caused by modern human intervention, and all as-yet undiscovered features. The highest quality for the best price on any GPR courses available anywhere!!!

CONTACT US
  • Facebook App Icon

© 2001/2011 - 2021 ArchaeoTek - Canada