Life by the Imperial Roads:
Roman Provincial Settlement Excavation and Survey
2014 Evaluation
Pre-Arrival:
Did the project staff provide you with enough information beforehand to organize your packing for and travel to the project?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 1 2 6 Average: 91%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Was the pickup arrangement made prior to the project adequately seen to by project staff?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 0 0 9 Average: 100%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Comments:
-
I just looked for the beard
-
Tell people to bring towels
-
Towels…
-
I always bring a towel
Housing:
Were the living accommodations provided by the project adequate for your needs?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 0 1 8 Average: 98%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Comments:
-
I <3 Tante Leana
-
Milika is a sweetheart!
-
Wish I had a mirror above the bathroom sink.
Food:
Were the meals provided by the project adequate for your needs?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 0 0 9 Average: 100%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Comments:
-
Perhaps too tasty. I may have gained weight.
-
Can I get a recipe book?
-
I also <3 sarmale.
-
Freaking love mici
General Logistics:
Did you encounter any problems with the accommodations, food or travel?
-
No
-
NO
-
Not with Archaeotek
-
Yes
-
NO
-
No, except the well water…
-
No
-
No
If so, did you ask the project staff for assistance?
-
Yes
Was the project staff able to address your concerns to your satisfaction?
-
Yes
-
Yes!
-
Every time!!
Lectures:
Were the formal lectures presented informative and useful?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 0 2 7 Average: 96%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Were the formal lectures presented interesting and engaging?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 1 1 7 Average: 93%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Did you find the supplementary materials provided informative and useful?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 0 2 7 Average: 96%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Comments:
-
I didn’t do the readings, but plan to eventually.
-
Uhhhh……! [and a drawing of a cap with a feather in it]
-
My dad liked the articles too.
-
I wish there were even more lectures and materials
Excavation and Survey:
Were the instructions provided by project staff in the field clear and helpful?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 1 1 7 Average: 93%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Did the project staff offer you a thorough theoretical understanding of the methods being employed?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 1 0 2 6 Average: 89%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Did your participation in the project offer new understandings of archaeological field methods?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 0 1 8 Average: 98%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Did you feel actively engaged in all aspects of data collection in the field?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 1 0 8 Average: 96%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Comments:
-
You should mention up front what we’re looking for in trenches. I think I easily destroyed 2 ft. of painted plaster before I knew it was a thing.
-
I learned more here in the field than in three archaeology classes combined.
-
I’m a very hands-on person and I learned more about archaeology on this dig than I did in my theory classes.
Laboratory:
Were the instructions provided by project staff in the lab clear and helpful?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 1 2 6 Average: 91%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Do you feel you gained an understanding of the analytical methods employed (i.e. phosphate soil analysis, typological sorting of ceramics, etc.)?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 1 1 7 Average: 93%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Did you feel actively engaged in all aspects of analysis in the lab?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 0 1 8 Average: 98%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Comments:
-
Did we do [type sorting]?
-
It was quite cramped @ times.
General:
Did you feel overall intellectually engaged with your work?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 1 2 6 Average: 91%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Was the project staff able to adequately answer all of your questions?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 0 0 9 Average: 100%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Were your interactions with the Romanian staff informative and helpful?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
Evaluation: 0 0 0 0 9 Average: 100%
Evaluation participation: 9/13 (69% of participants)
Comments:
-
I thought it was great to work w/ the Romanians and especially hear lectures by them in their areas of specialty- e.g. Alex and the prehistory lecture.
-
YAS
-
10/10 I would follow Marius into battle.
-
Te ador Romanians!
-
Marius and Alex were freaking fantastic.
Overall Comments:
Please provide us with your thoughts on what you found most rewarding about your archaeological experience on the project:
-
We got a chance to do a little bit of everything - total station, lab work, even reenactment. Drew from a large scope of experiences in order to gain an understanding of culture.
-
Enjoyed working with students and staff. Digging!
-
Overall it was an incredible experience! We got along well which was awesome, and the staff were excellent. I will return next year.
-
Bessie.
-
Interacting with locals and putting our finds in perspective by visiting local sites was highly rewarding. Each experience drove home what we learned.
Other comments?
-
The weekend trips were great, thank you for those. 10/10 would recommend. POSEIDON BEARD
-
Several disagreements with data collection - surface collection in drastically varying vegetation level - wait, that’s it.
-
Thanks for a great dig!